Let me state now I do not approve of Hawkes' style.His footwork is wrong, hopelessly wrong and I fear that unless he corrects it, it may keep him from attaining the place his natural abilities promise."Austral," the famous critic, describes him as "having the genius of the game."Jack Hawkes has an exaggerated American twist service that, since he is a left-hander, places an unnecessary strain on his heart muscles.It carries terrific twist but little speed and does not Pay him for the amount of energy he expends.
His forehand drive is excellent, fast, deep, and well placed, yet in ****** this he steps away from the ball, again wasting energy.His backhand is a poke and very unreliable.To save it he runs around everything possible, again causing unnecessary exertion.His volleying is brilliant while his overhead is magnificent.
Hawkes' waste of energy has cost him many a match, yet for all the inherent defects in his game he is so clever in using what he has, his tactics are so good for so young a player that I believe he will be one of the leading players of the world in a few years.Under the watchful eyes of Norman Brookes I foresee Hawkes changing his footwork to at least areasonable copy of the old master.
J.O.ANDERSON
This young player is again a promise rather than a star.He is a big, rangy, hard-hitting type like Gerald Patterson.He is crude, at times careless and unfortunately handicapped in 1920 and 1921 by a severe illness that only allowed him to resume play in the middle of the latter year.His ground strokes are flat drives fore and backhand.His forehand is a particularly fine shot.He hits it with a short sharp snap of his arm that imparts great speed and yet hides the direction.His backhand is defensive.His volleying clever, accurate but soft.His overhand severe and reliable.His service flat, fast and dangerous.
He needs finesse, experience and season, with which he may well become one of the greatest players as the fundamental potentialities are there.
NORMAN PEACH
The steady baseline game of England has its exponent in Australia in Norman Peach.He has a beautiful driving game, with adequate but not severe service, that one finds so much in England.At times Peach will advance to the net but his volleying and overhead are secondary to his baseline game.He is not a great tennis player but is certainly one of high standard of play.He is just below the first flight in Australia.
R.V.Thomas is one of the finest doubles players in the world as is amply attested by his win of the world's title in 1919 with Pat O'Hara Wood and their two successive wins of the Australian Championship in 1919-20.Thomas with his hard-hitting off the ground, and his brilliant volleying is a fine foil for Pat Wood's steady accuracy.
Just a word about one veteran, a good friend of mine, who is again playing fine tennis, Rodney L.Heath, hero of the famous Davis Cup match in 1911 when he defeated W.A.Larned, is again in the game.
Heath with his long beautiful groundstrokes, forehand, or backhand, his incisive crisp volleys and fine, generalship based on young experience, is a notable figure in the tennis world.
The mantle of Wilding and Brookes must fall on the shoulders of a really great player.Who it will be is hard to say at present.No outstandingfigure looms on the horizon at the time of writing.
South Africa
The 1920 South African Davis Cup team players, following their disastrous defeat by Holland, journeyed to England for the Championship and following tournaments, and I had the opportunity of studying three players of great promise.The remaining two were excellent, but hardly as exceptional as the former.
Charles Winslow, the leading player in the team, has a remarkable versatile game.He uses a high, bounding service of good speed, which at times he follows to the net.His best ground stroke is a severe chop, not unlike Wallace F.Johnson.He has a good drive both forehand and backhand, which he only uses when pressed or in attempting to pass a net man.He volleys very well, and covers the net quickly.His overhead is very severe, steady, and reliable.He is a fine natural player just below the top flight.He is an excellent strategist, and mixes his shots very well.He has exceptionally fast footwork, and repeatedly runs around his backhand to chop diagonally across the court in a manner very similar to Johnson.
B.I.C.Norton, the South African champion, a youngster of twenty, is a phenomenal player of extreme brilliancy.He has everything in stroke equipment, drives, slices, volleys, and a fine service and overhead.Unfortunately Norton regards his tennis largely as a joke.His judgment is therefore faulty, and he is apt to loaf on the court.He tries the most impossible shots that sometimes go in; and in the main, his court generalship is none too good.
He is an irrepressible boy, and his merry smile and chatter make him a tremendous favourite with the gallery.He has a very strong personality that should carry him a long way.
Louis Raymond, the left-handed star of the South Africans, has an excellent ground game coupled with a good service and fair volleying and overhead.His game is not remarkable.He is a hard-working, deserving player who attains success by industry rather than natural talent.His judgment is sound and methods of play orthodox, except for a tendency to run around his backhand.
C.R.Blackbeard, the youngest member of the team, and G.H.Dodd,its captain, are both very excellent players of the second flight.Blackbeard is very young, not yet twenty, and may develop into a star.At present he chops too much, and is very erratic........
There are many other players whom I would analyse if I had the time or space; but in these days of paper shortage and ink scarcity, conservation is the keynote of the times.
Let me turn for a few moments to the women whose fame in the tennis world is the equal of the men I have been analysing.
